Think pink

After two years of tennis lessons, my daughter Jordan said, “Mom, I don’t want to play tennis.”

Those words sting the ears of any tennis-playing parent. But it was my sport, not hers. 

Jordan returned to tennis in 8th grade—her idea. She played on the varsity team through high school. Years later, I asked my daughter why she decided to play again.

“I loved the clothes—the tennis skirts and dresses. They were the coolest uniforms,” she said.

I rolled my eyes; I’m sure of it.

Over the past two months, I’ve worn tennis skirts and dresses to state competition in SC with three of my USTA teams. The first tournament took place on a rainy, dreary weekend on Hilton Head Island.

Ours was a good team, but we responded poorly to the weather-shortened, 8-game pro-set matches. 

The only bright spots on those gray days were vivid pink tennis towels stacked on the tournament desk—prizes for the winners of each division. Prizes my team didn’t win.

Bummer.

Back in 2023, when two of my teams won state championships, the towels were orange, my least favorite color. Of all the colors in the rainbow, who chooses orange for a trophy towel? 

After the wet and miserable Hilton Head debacle, I traveled with a different team to Aiken, SC. At the tennis center, a bit of dazzle caught my eye. 

And there they were, those bright pink towels. They winked at me from a folded stack on the tournament desk.

Blue skies smiled down on us that weekend, but again, the word “short” got in the way. Not shortened sets, but our team was shorthanded due to injury, travel, and illness. 

We won our final match, but envy sent me hurrying to my car. I couldn’t bear to watch the winning players wave their—instead of OUR—brilliant pink towels. 

By the time I headed to States in Florence, SC with my 40s Combo Team, I had erased those cool, fun pink towels from my mind—or so I thought. 

On day one, at Frances Marion University, we played with the fiery intensity of the sun above us. After seizing our first two matches, we were tied with Hilton Head (HH) for first place. 

Water coolers and bananas rested on the metal bleachers—not a pretty, pink towel anywhere in sight. Nor did the coveted towels find me on day two at Florence Tennis Center.

That morning, our team stood alone at the top after prevailing against HH on two of our three courts in highly contested matches.

Our reign was short-lived (“short,” again). 

That afternoon, following a “let’s finish-the-job” pep talk, we lost 2-1 to Columbia. My court suffered a crushing blow, losing 13-11 in a third-set tiebreak. 

If you don’t think I replayed that match in my head all night long, think again.

When we arrived at the courts the next morning, we were one of three teams that sat at 3-1. The final match was a must-win to claim the title.

I headed to the court with my partner, still berating myself for the loss the night before. 

I said to myself, “Self, look forward, not backward. Forward progress is progress.”

No one was happier than my partner (and maybe me) when my will to win finally kicked in.

We joined the team outside the deciding court and held onto our hearts as we watched our teammates claim a tight second set. They finished the breaker with a resounding overhead smash. 

As we gathered in a circle to celebrate, my eyes found the tournament desk. 

And there they were, the towels. Those vivid, dazzling, brilliant, bright, beautiful, cool, fun, pretty, pink towels.

“The pink towels belong to us!” I shouted as my teammates cheered.

Tennis is not about the clothes; it’s all about the towels.

Standing up

The issues of freedom of speech and protecting women’s sports have put the national spotlight on WV, Harrison County in particular. It’s impossible to explore one without alluding to the other.

Judge Thomas Bedell recently issued a preliminary injunction against the Harrison County Board of Education, “preventing it and its schools from punishing athletes for future free speech.”

I’ll fill you in.

Five middle school girls’ track athletes protested against competing with a biological male in the shotput event. The protest went viral after former University of Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines praised their courage. Individuals and groups who support the “Save Women’s Sports” (SWS) campaign also lauded the athletes.

Parents filed a lawsuit to protect free speech after their daughters’ coach enforced an “unwritten” rule: athletes who intentionally “scratch” an event would not be allowed to compete in that event at the next meet.

The words “unwritten rule” triggered the problem. In what professional arena is a rule not documented—on paper—a serious rule, a rule not to be broken? Most believe an unwritten rule bends easily—imposed in some cases, but not others.

Another key issue revolves around the true definition of “scratch” in track and field. The NCAA written rule is consistent with what I’ve witnessed in past middle and high school track competitions:

“A Scratch, for any reason, is a voluntary abandonment of an event by the participant prior to the staging of the event. … the staging of the event is the point in time where participants are escorted to, or allowed to be at, the site of the event.”

Therefore, the five athletes did not scratch. They did not elect to take themselves out of the shotput competition “prior to the event.”

They were present. Their names were called. They entered the circle—shotput in hand—and silently walked away without attempting a throw.

The girls did not scratch. They exercised their constitutional right to free speech by protesting an issue that affects them and the futures of female athletes near and far.

Based on the clarification of “scratch,” there was no basis for employing a disciplinary rule, much less an undocumented regulation. The word “unwritten” negates any avenues for justification of the “rule.”

On the other hand, if one reviews the current Presidential administration’s proposed changes to Title IX, the young women’s brave protest is justified.

Edits to the 1972 law to protect equal opportunities for women in sports include replacing the word “sex” with “gender identity.” If that happens, the new Title IX would be based on how a person identifies rather than his biological truth at birth.

This problem does not exist for biological women who wish to identify as men. They do not attempt to enter the male sports arena because they know they cannot physically compete with men. Thus, the reason why males who wish to identify as women must draw the line at competing in women’s sports.

Biological women fought for years for the passage and implementation of Title IX. With one flourish of a pen, a preposterous new definition of women will effectively erase the intent of that law.

As Judge Bedell stated, the case at hand is about freedom of speech. If the court’s decision does not support our valuable constitutional right to be heard, there is reason for serious concern.

As for the issue of protecting women’s sports, the courts have not been kind, e.g., the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals (VA) blocking WV’s “Save Women’s Sports Act.”

A double standard exists in this climate that claims to champion women. If courts continue to turn their backs on reality, on saving women’s sports, freedom of speech becomes even more essential.

It is up to all biologically female athletes to be as courageous as five middle schoolers and stand up for truth by standing down.